The Bohr and Einstein Debate:-Copenhagen Interpretation Challenged
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The Bohr-Einstein debate and quantum entanglement
In quantum physics, the value of an observable such as the position or velocity of a particle can generally only be predicted statistically, by the probability of finding a particular value. Niels Bohr, one of the founders of quantum mechanics, considered the probabilistic nature of the predictions of this theory to be fundamental. However, for Albert Einstein, the impossibility of predicting t...
متن کاملThe Bohr-Einstein debate and quantum entanglement
In quantum physics, the value of an observable such as the position or velocity of a particle can generally only be predicted statistically, by the probability of finding a particular value. Niels Bohr, one of the founders of quantum mechanics, considered the probabilistic nature of the predictions of this theory to be fundamental. However, for Albert Einstein, the impossibility of predicting t...
متن کاملWhen champions meet: Rethinking the Bohr–Einstein debate
Einstein’s philosophy of physics (as clarified by Fine, Howard, and Held) was predicated on his Trennungsprinzip, a combination of separability and locality, without which he believed objectification, and thereby “physical thought” and “physical laws”, to be impossible. Bohr’s philosophy (as elucidated by Hooker, Scheibe, Folse, Howard, Held, and others), on the other hand, was grounded in a se...
متن کاملControversy between Einstein and Bohr and Two Erroneous Arguments Used in Supporting Copenhagen Quantum Mechanics
The support of Copenhagen quantum mechanics in the discussion concerning EPR experiments has been based fundamentally on two mistakes. First, quantum mechanics as well as hidden-variable theory give the same predictions; the statement of Belinfante from 1973 about the significant difference must be denoted as mistake. Secondly, the experimental violation of Bell's inequalities has been erroneou...
متن کاملOnce Again on the 'demythologizing' of the Clock-in-the-box Debate of Bohr and Einstein *
The reply of de la Torre, Daleo and García-Mata [Eur. J. Phys. 23 (2002) L15–L16] to a criticism of their 'demythologizing' analysis of the clock-in-the-box debate between Einstein and Bohr is commented on. The main point of the reply [1] of de la Torre, Daleo and García-Mata (TDG) to my criticism [2] of their 'demythologizing' analysis [3] of the arguments of Bohr and Einstein concerning the f...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: SSRN Electronic Journal
سال: 2018
ISSN: 1556-5068
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3221514